LogoLogo
  • Welcome
  • Note - Draft, prototype status
  • Note - Licensing, quoting
  • Meet meet.coop
    • The online meeting coop - meet.coop
    • Contact us
  • 1 Principles
    • Principles
      • Spaces
      • The toolstack
      • Platform spaces
      • Media spaces
      • Venue spaces
      • Stack of commons
      • Privacy policy
    • Commoning
      • Spaces stewarded as commons
      • Commoning - Three moments
      • Contributing in commons - A governance hybrid
      • Classic FLOSS peer-to-peer governance
      • Classic co-op governance
      • Assemblies - Governance in ‘roots’ movement organisations
      • Full-range commoning - The contribution of care work
      • Commoning as a practice of dual power - Beyond . .
    • Principles & protocols
      • Value and value(ing)
      • Values as practices in working order
      • Coop values, DisCO
  • 2 Political economy
    • Political economy
    • Members and contributions
      • User members, user-member accounts
      • Active user members
      • Operational members
      • Register of members
      • Privileges and obligations
      • Sanctions
      • Fair use of BBB space
      • Contributions
      • Contribution accounting
        • Contribution & recognition
        • Contributions & locations of work
        • Work of valuing, and means of recording and valuing (mapping) contributions
      • Funding contributions
      • Rent
      • Contributions in kind
      • Work contributions
      • Recognition of contributions
      • Voting
    • Commons political economy
      • Ownership, assets and commons
      • Dissolving meet.coop
      • Fiat money, mutual credit, fair wage, sweat equity
      • A commons and its members - Stewarding, contributing, enjoying
      • Dependence - Livelihood, infrastructure, dual power
      • Livelihood, privilege, contribution
      • Provisioning and hosting
      • Employment, federation and voluntary contribution
      • Revenue, surplus and distribution
      • Development funding, investment
      • Value, values, value(ing) and production in-and-of commons
      • Contribution, privilege and justice - The purpose of protocols
  • 3 Social relations
    • Social relations
    • Intentions, principles
    • Actions in three landscapes
    • Dimensions of community
      • Plural community - Three sectors
      • Pluriverse
      • 1 Coop - Transformed economy, making the coop-commons
      • 2 Solidarity - Transformed silos, formación
        • Tools for conviviality
        • Formación - Learning, the dance of knowing
      • 3 Toolstack - Transformed organising capability, infrastructuring
        • Dance of knowing
        • Design justice
      • Multiple languages, plural regions, uneven development
      • Privacy
    • Seven Rs of civil-society activist commitment
      • Rescue
      • Resistance
      • Reporting, recording
      • Re-weaving the economy
      • Reparation, reconciliation, restorative justice
      • Regenerative activism
      • Regime change, revolution
  • 4 Assemblies and deliberations
    • Assemblies and deliberations
      • Circles
        • Community circle
      • Standing assembly (all-hands)
      • commons.hour
      • General assembly
      • Board of stewards
      • The forum
      • Polls
      • Protocols - Time
      • Protocols - Multiple languages
      • Protocols - Facilitation & moderation
  • 5 commons.hour
    • commons.hour - The programme
      • Basic links for commons.hour
      • commons.hour invitation
      • Programme & presenters
      • Defining what meet.coop does - A handbook and a commons
      • Prototyping and collaborating
      • Defining what meet.coop is for
      • Running list of sessions
      • Summary running list
      • Design and prototyping in commons.hour
      • commons.hour - the venue
    • commons.hour protocols
      • Session protocols
      • Session pre- and post-protocols
      • commons.hour methodology
    • Design principles
      • Design justice - note
      • Plural community
      • Coop principles
      • commons.hour ‘specials'
  • 6 Constitution
    • Constitution
      • Conventional outline of a constitution
      • A design approach to a constitution - an assemblage of protocols
      • Protocols vs rules
      • The handbook and the constitution
      • Core protocols aka principles of meet.coop
      • Draft constitution
  • 7 Code of conduct
    • Code of conduct
      • In platform spaces
      • In media spaces
      • In venue spaces
      • Operational members
      • User members
      • Making the coop-commons economy
      • Provisioning and mobilising tools and capability
      • Cultivating solidarity and mutuality
  • 8 Terminology
    • Terminology
      • BBB - Big Blue Button
      • Containers
      • Discourse
      • FLOSS - Free-libre open-source software
      • gitBook
      • Greenlight
      • Markdown
      • Matrix/Element
      • NextCloud
      • Sweat equity
      • Sysadmins aka ‘admins’
  • 9 Supporting materials
  • Supporting materials
    • meet.coop
    • Other organisations
      • Open Credit Network - Membership Agreement
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

  1. 6 Constitution
  2. Constitution

Protocols vs rules

Here we make a distinction between protocols, and possible interpretations of ‘rules’.

PreviousA design approach to a constitution - an assemblage of protocolsNextThe handbook and the constitution

Last updated 2 years ago

Was this helpful?

Updated: 19jul2021

This topic is incomplete, to be expanded xxx

meet.coop, as a commons, operates on a contribution basis, a mutualised practice basis, an in-context, systemic basis. 'Rules ' is not necessarily the most helpful way to express how things are done in this kind of organised social endeavour. Rather, we frame things in terms of protocols that govern . . , practices, actions-in-contexts (ie in commoned ), operational venues (), etc.

xxx Ostrom: rules as ‘scientific laws’ of successful commons, as generalised systems. Versus .

xxx Bollier & Helfrich: pattern language as a narrative frame, a ‘scripting-language’, a ‘language-of-action’, a ‘choreography-repertoire’ of commoning; a repertoire for ’singing’ patterns into practice, by a (rehearsed) ‘chorus’ of commoners-with-history and with-mutuality and with-common-means.

In general, these should not be expected to clash with Ostrom's 'rules'. It's just that they are framed from the standpoint of an in-context, self-organising actor or community of actors, rather than from the externalised 'quasi-objective standpoint of economic or systems 'science'.

The meet.coop handbook is basically framed in terms of protocols. We regard protocols as being framings of a similar kind to the 'patterns' that Bollier and Helfrich for practices of commoning. They are more locally specific to the particular commons that meet.coop provisions and stewards, but the way of working with them is basically similar. Protocols are patterns of practice: small pieces of organisatioanl life that give shape, dimension and intention to the commons of digital infrastructure and the multistakeholder practice of commoning.

See also: []

More on protocols? Linked to ? Linked to ? xxx

contributions
spaces
Circles
Commoning
social relations
political economy